MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111213652 · doi:10.1109/ted.2003.813241

Effects of hot-carrier stress on the performance of the lc-tank cmos oscillators

2003· article· en· W2111213652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsOscillation (cell signaling)CMOSMaterials scienceStress (linguistics)AmplitudeNoise (video)Phase noiseLC circuitOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringDegradation (telecommunications)VoltagePhysicsEngineeringCapacitorChemistryOpticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of hot carrier stress on a fully integrated negative resistance LC-tank CMOS oscillator are investigated. The major effect is the decrease of the amplitude of the oscillation due to degradation in the I-V characteristics of the MOSFETs. The oscillator phase noise increases with stress duration since the amplitude of the oscillation decreases. A change in the biasing of the circuit due to the stress affects the parasitic capacitances in the circuit which in turn cause a slight change in the oscillation frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it