Functional assessment of the cervical esophagus after gastric transposition and cervical esophagogastrostomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate swallowing and function of the cervical esophagus after esophageal resection and reconstruction. METHODS: Nine patients (8 males, 1 female; median age 63 years), who underwent esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma, were studied from 6 to 40 months (median 18 months) postoperatively. For all patients, the upper gastrointestinal tract was reconstructed by transposing a narrow gastric tube through the posterior mediastinum to the left neck, where a semi-mechanical anastomosis to the cervical esophagus was performed. No patient had an anatomic obstruction to swallowing or stricture. The oral and pharyngeal phases of deglutition and function of the cervical esophagus were evaluated objectively by video barium swallow, esophagogastroscopy, velopharyngeal examination, manometry and balloon inflation in the cervical esophagus. RESULTS: The median length of the cervical esophagus was 5 cm (range 3-7 cm). Mild reflux laryngopharyngitis was seen in all patients. Although all patients had an objective functional dysphagia measurement (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association) of 7 (normal), five reported subjective dysphagia. Four (of the five symptomatic) patients were found to have high pressure peristalitic activity (mean >100 mmHg) following balloon distention (10-30 ml) of the cervical esophagus, which was painful in three cases. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in the absence of an anatomic cause for dysphagia after cervical esophagogastrostomy, a functional etiology may be explained by hypertensive peristalsis resulting from distention of the remaining cervical esophageal remnant. These findings may further explain anecdotal reports of the efficacy of empiric dilation after upper gastrointestinal reconstruction when no stricture is seen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".