MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111267389 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2009.2031833

Two-Dimensional Subwavelength-Focused Imaging Using a Near-Field End-Fire Antenna-Array Probe

2009· article· en· W2111267389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsBroadsideAntenna (radio)OpticsAngular resolution (graph drawing)Symmetry (geometry)Image resolutionField (mathematics)Antenna arrayNear and far fieldField of viewComputer scienceGeometryTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> A two-dimensional imaging technique is proposed based on an array of monopole antennas that produces a near-field subwavelength focal spot. The antennas are designed to produce an end-fire, rather than broadside, near-field beam in order to increase the degree of rotational symmetry in the structure. Since two-dimensional focusing does not automatically translate to two-dimensional imaging, symmetry was the key to extending subwavelength imaging to two dimensions. Simulations were conducted to demonstrate the improved resolution of the antenna array probe with a final minimum resolvable spacing of $0.256\lambda $ at a distance of $\lambda /4$. </para>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it