Enzyme I and HPr from <i>Lactobacillus casei</i>: their role in sugar transport, carbon catabolite repression and inducer exclusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have cloned and sequenced the Lactobacillus casei ptsH and ptsI genes, which encode enzyme I and HPr, respectively, the general components of the phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS). Northern blot analysis revealed that these two genes are organized in a single-transcriptional unit whose expression is partially induced. The PTS plays an important role in sugar transport in L. casei, as was confirmed by constructing enzyme I-deficient L. casei mutants, which were unable to ferment a large number of carbohydrates (fructose, mannose, mannitol, sorbose, sorbitol, amygdaline, arbutine, salicine, cellobiose, lactose, tagatose, trehalose and turanose). Phosphorylation of HPr at Ser-46 is assumed to be important for the regulation of sugar metabolism in Gram-positive bacteria. L. casei ptsH mutants were constructed in which phosphorylation of HPr at Ser-46 was either prevented or diminished (replacement of Ser-46 of HPr with Ala or Thr respectively). In a third mutant, Ile-47 of HPr was replaced with a threonine, which was assumed to reduce the affinity of P-Ser-HPr for its target protein CcpA. The ptsH mutants exhibited a less pronounced lag phase during diauxic growth in a mixture of glucose and lactose, two PTS sugars, and diauxie was abolished when cells were cultured in a mixture of glucose and the non-PTS sugars ribose or maltose. The ptsH mutants synthesizing Ser-46-Ala or Ile-47-Thr mutant HPr were partly or completely relieved from carbon catabolite repression (CCR), suggesting that the P-Ser-HPr/CcpA-mediated mechanism of CCR is common to most low G+C Gram-positive bacteria. In addition, in the three constructed ptsH mutants, glucose had lost its inhibitory effect on maltose transport, providing for the first time in vivo evidence that P-Ser-HPr participates also in inducer exclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".