MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111289685 · doi:10.1186/1476-0711-8-25

Antifungal treatment for invasive Candida infections: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis

2009· article· en· W2111289685 on OpenAlexaff
Edward J. Mills, Dan Peeri, Curtis Cooper, Jean B. Nachega, Wu Ping, Imad M. Tleyjeh, P. R. Philips

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Infectious Diseases CentreSimon Fraser UniversityOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical microbiologyMeta-analysisAntifungalAntifungal drugsInvasive candidiasisParasitologyMedicineCandida infectionsIntensive care medicineAntifungal drugInternal medicineFluconazoleBiologyMicrobiologyImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medicine, Faculty of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.338
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Clinical Microbiology and AntimicrobialsSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207