MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111298767 · doi:10.1109/vetec.1989.40119

Application of bit error rate monitoring to differential detection of MSK, QPSK, OQPSK and DUOMSK signals

2003· article· en· W2111298767 on OpenAlex
K. Defly, M. Lecours

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase-shift keyingMinimum-shift keyingBit error rateKeyingAmplitudeAlgorithmMonte Carlo methodAmplitude and phase-shift keyingOffset (computer science)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringDecoding methodsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pseudoerror method based on amplitude threshold variation is applied to differential detection of QPSK (quaternary phase-shift keying), OQPSK (offset QPSK), DUOMSK (duobinary minimum-shift keying), and MSK signals. The objective of this differential-detection estimation was to reduce the simulation time required for bit-error-rate estimation relative to the Monte Carlo method. The gain in simulation time obtained in this way was shown in a specific case to be on the order of 5.5 and 8.7 for amplitude thresholds of 10 and 15%. The small approximation error values of the order of 0.1 to 0.4 dB obtained with these thresholds lead to the conclusion that the method gives very good results, permitting performance estimates for bit error rates smaller than 10/sup -4/.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it