MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111309068 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2013.2273939

An Interleaved LLC Resonant Converter Operating at Constant Switching Frequency

2013· article· en· W2111309068 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterleavingConvertersRippleCapacitorSwitching frequencyPower (physics)Electrical engineeringInductorConstant (computer programming)Electronic engineeringEngineeringVoltageComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)PhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interleaving technique is necessary for LLC resonant converters to achieve high power level. The advantages include expanded power capacity, lower output ripple current, and higher light-load efficiency by using phase shedding. However, conventional frequency-controlled LLC converters will lose regulation in individual phases if all the phases are operating at the same switching frequency, causing load sharing problem. Existing load sharing solutions for interleaved LLC converters all have limitations. In this paper, a switch-controlled capacitor (SCC) modulated LLC converter (SCC-LLC) is presented to solve the load-sharing problem. With constant switching frequency, interleaving and phase shedding can be achieved. A 600-W, two-phase interleaved constant frequency SCC-LLC prototype is built to verify the feasibility and demonstrate the advantages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it