A MRAS-Based Adaptive Pseudoreduced-Order Flux Observer for Sensorless Induction Motor Drives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of vector-controlled sensorless induction motor drives is generally poor at very low speeds, especially at zero speed due to offset and drift components in the acquired feedback signals, and the increased sensitivity of dynamic performance to model parameter mismatch resulting especially from stator resistance variations. The speed estimation is adversely affected by stator resistance variations due to temperature and frequency changes. This is particularly significant at very low speeds where the calculated flux deviates from its set values. Therefore, it is necessary to compensate for the parameter variation in sensorless induction motor drives, particularly at very low speeds. This paper presents a novel method of estimating both the shaft speed and stator resistance of an induction motor. In this novel scheme, an adaptive pseudoreduced-order flux observer (APFO) is developed. In comparison to the adaptive full-order flux observer (AFFO), the proposed method consumes less computational time, and provides a better stator resistance estimation dynamic performance. Both simulation and experimental results confirm the superiority of the proposed APFO scheme for a wide range of resistance variations from 0 to 100%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".