Cone-beam reprojection using projection-matrices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses reprojection of three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions obtained from cone-beam scans using a C-arm imaging equipment assisted by a pose-determining system. The emphasis is on reprojecting without decomposing the estimated projection matrix (P-matrix) associated with a pose. Both voxel- and ray-driven methods are considered. The voxel-driven reprojector follows the algorithm for backprojection using a P-matrix. The ray-driven reprojector is derived by extracting from the P-matrix the equation of the line joining a detector-pixel and the X-ray source position. This reprojector can be modified to a ray-driven backprojector. When the geometry is specified explicitly in terms of the physical parameters of the imaging system, the projection matrices can be constructed. The resulting "projection-matrix method" is advantageous, especially when the scanning trajectory is irregular. The algorithms presented are useful in iterative methods of image reconstruction and enhancement procedures, apart from their well-known role in visualization and volume rendering. Reprojections of 3-D patient data compare favorably with the original X-ray projections obtained from a prototype C-arm system. The algorithms for reprojection can be modified to compute perspective maximum intensity projection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".