MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111339146 · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2013018

Error Exponents for Asymmetric Two-User Discrete Memoryless Source-Channel Coding Systems

2009· article· en· W2111339146 on OpenAlexaff
Yangfan Zhong, Fady Alajaji, L. L. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExponentDecoding methodsEncoderChannel (broadcasting)Source codeMathematicsLossless compressionCoding (social sciences)TransmitterAlgorithmComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Discrete mathematicsData compressionStatisticsTelecommunicationsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the transmission of two discrete memoryless correlated sources, consisting of a common and a private source, over a discrete memoryless multiterminal channel with two transmitters and two receivers. At the transmitter side, the common source is observed by both encoders but the private source can only be accessed by one encoder. At the receiver side, both decoders need to reconstruct the common source, but only one decoder needs to reconstruct the private source. We hence refer to this system by the asymmetric two-user source-channel coding system. We derive a universally achievable lossless joint source-channel coding (JSCC) error exponent pair for the two-user system by using a technique which generalizes Csiszar's type-packing lemma (1980) for the point-to-point (single-user) discrete memoryless source-channel system. We next investigate the largest convergence rate of asymptotic exponential decay of the system (overall) probability of erroneous transmission, i.e., the system JSCC error exponent. We obtain lower and upper bounds for the exponent. As a consequence, we establish a JSCC theorem with single-letter characterization and we show that the separation principle holds for the asymmetric two-user scenario. By introducing common randomization, we also provide a formula for the tandem (separate) source-channel coding error exponent. Numerical examples show that for a large class of systems consisting of two correlated sources and an asymmetric multiple-access channel with additive noise, the JSCC error exponent considerably outperforms the corresponding tandem coding error exponent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207