MétaCan
← all works

Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment.

2000· article· en· 1,214 citations· W2111348693 on OpenAlex· 10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.49

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Classifier prediction

metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90

Predictions imitate two machine teachers. Scores are not calibrated prevalence probabilities.

Classifier candidate
ObservationalQualitative
Classifier consensus
Observational
Teacher imitation scores

Codex

Observational0.363
Qualitative0.042
Metaresearch0.032
Research integrity0.032
Other design0.020
Not applicable0.012
Theoretical or conceptual0.004
Bench or experimental0.002
Randomized trial0.001
Open science0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Simulation or modelling0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Case report0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Bibliometrics0.000
Systematic review0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000

Gemma

Observational0.998
Research integrity0.009
Theoretical or conceptual0.005
Qualitative0.002
Not applicable0.001
Randomized trial0.001
Metaresearch0.001
Simulation or modelling0.001
Non-randomized trial0.000
Case report0.000
Bibliometrics0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Bench or experimental0.000
Open science0.000
Systematic review0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.250
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread
0.223 how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

The unidimensional model of acculturation posits that heritage and mainstream culture identifications have a strong inverse relation, whereas the bidimensional model posits that the 2 identifications are independent. The authors compared these models in 3 samples of ethnic Chinese (ns = 164, 150, and 204), 1 sample of non-Chinese East Asians (n = 70), and one diverse group of acculturating individuals (n = 140). Although the unidimensional measure showed a coherent pattern of external correlates, the bidimensional measure revealed independent dimensions corresponding to heritage and mainstream culture identification. These dimensions displayed patterns of noninverse correlations with personality, self-identity, and psychosocial adjustment. The authors conclude that the bidimensional model is a more valid and useful operationalization of acculturation.

Retrieved from PubMed through NCBI EFetch. Structured section labels are preserved.