MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111355788 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl606

Sodium citrate 4% locking solution for central venous dialysis catheters--an effective, more cost-efficient alternative to heparin

2006· article· en· W2111355788 on OpenAlexaff
L. Grudzinski, P. Quinan, Sheldon J. J. Kwok, Andreas Pierratos

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHumber River Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCatheterSodium citrateHeparinHemodialysisDialysis catheterAnesthesiaDialysisSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis of the central venous haemodialysis catheter compromises dialysis adequacy and catheter survival. Heparin containing catheter-locking solution has been associated with bleeding, interferes with INR (prothrombin time/international normalized ratio) measurements and is costly. Sodium citrate has been used successfully as a catheter-locking solution, but long-term experience with its use as the exclusive locking solution has not been published. METHODS: Our haemodialysis unit converted to locking all central venous haemodialysis catheters with sodium citrate 4% instead of heparin 10 000 U/ml. A retrospective analysis compared the outcomes of the year prior and after the conversion. Flow-related catheter exchange rate, prevalence of INR assay interference, tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) utilization rate, rate of bacteraemias and annual cost of locking agent were examined. RESULTS: During the study period, 30 925 and 37 139 catheter days were identified during the heparin and citrate years, respectively. The rate of flow-related catheter exchange was not different during the two periods (1.81 vs 1.88 per 1000 catheter days, P = 0.89). Falsely elevated INR values were eliminated with citrate and the rate of rt-PA treatments was similar during the two periods (4.1 vs 3.23 per 1000 catheter days respectively, P = 0.07). The number of bacteraemias was similar during the two periods (0.77 vs 0.94 per 1000 catheter days respectively, P = 0.36) There was an 85% reduction in the costs associated with catheter-locking therapy during the citrate period. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmaco-economic benefits of sodium citrate 4% are well supported by this analysis. Furthermore, citrate offers several clinical advantages over concentrated heparin: citrate lock avoids heparin-associated bleeding complications, improves reliability of INR assays and provides an effective alternative for patients with suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207