MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111369957

New evidence on the causes of the fluctuations in ocean freight rates in the 1850s: harvest failures, business cycles, and the Crimean War

2007· article· en· W2111369957 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan Tore Klovland

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTonnageIndex (typography)Quarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsBusiness cycleAgricultural economicsGeographyMacroeconomicsHistoryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper takes a critical look at the hypothesis that the Crimean War was the main cause\nof the surge in ocean freight rates in the first part of the 1850s. The analysis is based on newly\nconstructed monthly data on world freight rates in the 1850s. A new type of freight rate index,\nreferred to as a repeat sailings index, is presented, which is similar to a type of index frequently\napplied to house prices. An econometric model of the determination of freight rates is estimated\non monthly data from the 1850s, from which it is possible to disentangle the effects on freight rates\ndue to the various demand and supply factors, including the Crimean War. It is found that harvest\nfailures, business cycles, the supply of tonnage and the Crimean War all significantly affected freight\nrates in this period. The Crimean War may have accounted for a quarter of the surge in freight\nrates in the years prior to the outbreak of the War; once the War broke out in March 1854, however,\nit was of less importance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Same topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207