MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111377264 · doi:10.1109/icnn.1996.548874

An adaptive and fully sparse training approach for multilayer perceptrons

2002· article· en· W2111377264 on OpenAlexaff
Fang Wang, Q.J. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackpropagationComputer scienceArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceFeed forwardPerceptronProcess (computing)Sparse approximationTraining (meteorology)Multilayer perceptronSet (abstract data type)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feedforward neural networkMachine learningEngineeringControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An adaptive and fully sparse backpropagation training approach is proposed in this paper. The technique speeds up training by combining a sparse optimization concept with neural network training. The sparse phenomenon due to neuron activation, which is inherent in neural networks, is exploited in both feedforward and backpropagation phases. A new computational algorithm with sparse pattern reuse and refreshment has been developed together with the adaptation procedure of a new set of parameters which regulate the sparse training process. The proposed training approach has been applied to speech recognition and circuit extraction problems and achieved significant speed-up of training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96)Same topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207