MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111410082 · doi:10.1080/01436597.2011.573948

Cautions, Questions and Opportunities in Sport for Development and Peace

2011· article· en· W2111410082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThird World Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhysical educationSociologyMedia studiesPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1 B Kidd, 'A new social movement: sport for development and peace', Sport in Society, 11(4), 2008, pp 370–380. The most comprehensive source is the International Platform for Sport and Development, at http://www.sportanddev.org. 2 For Canadian data, see Healthy Active Kids Canada, '2010 Report Card', at http://www.activehealthykids.ca/ReportCard/2010ReportCardOverview.aspx, accessed 15 September 2010; and P Donnelly, 'Sport participation in Canada', in J Harvey & L Thibault (eds), Sport Policy in Canada, forthcoming. The best international survey is of physical education, not sport participation, but it documents the paucity of opportunity in an important related area. See K Hardman & J Marshall, Second Worldwide Survey of School Physical Education, Berlin: International Council of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, 2009. 3 B Kidd & P Donnelly (eds), Literature Reviews on Sport for Development and Peace, Toronto: International Working Group on Sport for Development and Peace, 2007, emphasis in the original, at http://www.righttoplay.com/International/news-and-media/Documents/Policy%20Reports%20docs/Literature%20Reviews%20SDP.pdf, accessed 15 September 2010. The five reviews examined sport for children and youth, persons with disabilities, and girls and women; sport and health; and sport and reconciliation. 4 B Kidd & M MacDonnell, 'Peace, sport and development', in Kidd & Donnelly, Literature Reviews on Sport for Development and Peace, pp 158–195. 5 JA Mangan, The Games Ethic and Imperialism: Aspects of the Diffusion of an Ideal, London: Cass, 1998. 6 A Kruger & J Riordan (eds), The Story of Worker Sport, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1996; R Harney, 'Homo ludens and ethnicity', Polyphony, 7, 1985, pp 1–12; and R Lutan & F Hong, 'The politicization of sport: ganefo—a case study', Sport in Society, 8(3), 2005, pp 425–439.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it