MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Orientation Discrimination Thresholds in Migraine: A Measure of Visual Cortical Inhibition

2000· article· en· W2111419351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCephalalgia · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMigraineOrientation (vector space)Measure (data warehouse)NeuroscienceVisual cortexAudiologyPsychologyAnesthesiaGeometryComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orientation discrimination is a visual task dependent on inhibitory mechanisms in the visual cortex. In this study, orientation discrimination thresholds for bar and grating patterns were measured at two visual field locations in subjects with migraine with (n = 20) and without aura (n = 20) and in migraine-free control subjects (n = 20). No statistically significant differences were found between migraine groups and the control group on either task at foveal or peripheral visual field locations. No significant correlations were found between psychophysical thresholds and age, total lifetime auras or total lifetime migraine episodes. However, a trend was seen toward slightly impaired performance on the two foveal tasks in a subgroup of subjects with the highest total lifetime aura count. Thus we have found no convincing evidence that impaired cortical inhibitory mechanisms are a predisposing characteristic in migraine, but cannot rule out the possibility that cortical inhibitory mechanisms may be adversely affected by repeated visual auras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it