MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2111468486 · doi:10.12927/hcq..16639

Telephone Contact Centre Links to Primary Healthcare Reform

2002· article· en· W2111468486 on OpenAlexaffabout
S Weatherill, Susan Paul, Marianne C. Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCapital District Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoneNursingHealth careBusinessTelephone linePrimary health careCapital (architecture)Service (business)MedicinePrimary careFamily medicineTelecommunicationsMarketingPolitical scienceEngineeringGeographyTelephony

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

new telephone health advice service implemented in September 2000 is integral to the Capital Health (Edmonton) Region's strategy to build a comprehensive approach to primary healthcare.Capital Health Link operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week and was the first comprehensive nurse-based health advice phone line in Alberta.Callers to Capital Health Link ("Link") can talk to experienced and specially trained registered nurses for health advice, information about programs and services, and to register in selected Capital Health programs.Satisfaction ratings have been high from the outset as Link supports people to manage their health through informed choice and decisionmaking.Evaluation results indicate the service is helping the public access the most appropriate level of care.This has led to a reduction in the number of visits to emergency departments, drop-in medical clinics and family physicians' offices.Innovations for the future include linkages with a new electronic health record system and an expanded role in chronic disease management that will further support an integrated primary care strategy for the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1320.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Quarterly→Same topicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes→French-language works237,207→