Laboratory Simulation of Y-TZP All-ceramic Crown Clinical Failures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinically, zirconia-supported all-ceramic restorations are failing by veneer-chipping without exposing the zirconia interface. We hypothesized that mouth motion step-stress-accelerated fatigue testing of standardized dental crowns would permit this previously unrecognized failure mode to be investigated. Using CAD software, we imported the average dimensions of a mandibular first molar crown and modeled tooth preparation. The CAD-based tooth preparation was rapid-prototyped as a die for fabrication of zirconia core porcelain-veneered crowns. Crowns were bonded to aged composite reproductions of the preparation and aged 14 days in water. Crowns were single-cycle-loaded to failure or mouth-motion step-stress- fatigue-tested. Finite element analysis indicated high stress levels below the load and at margins, in agreement with only single-cycle fracture origins. As hypothesized, the mouth motion sliding contact fatigue resulted in veneer chipping, reproducing clinical findings allowing for investigations into the underlying causes of such failures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".