FORKED1 encodes a PH domain protein that is required for PIN1 localization in developing leaf veins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formation of Arabidopsis leaf veins is believed to require canalization of auxin into discrete and continuous cell files to generate a highly reproducible branched and reticulate pattern. During canalization, incipient veins become preferred routes for auxin transport through expression and asymmetric localization of the PINFORMED1 (PIN1) auxin efflux protein: PIN1 expression narrows from a group of cells to a single cell file, and localization of PIN1 protein becomes polarized to the cell membrane facing a previously formed vein. The shift in PIN1 localization is believed to require active vesicle cycling and be auxin-dependent, generating an autoregulatory loop. Previously, we have shown that fkd1 mutant leaves have an open vein pattern that lacks distal vein meeting. Here, we identify FKD1 as encoding a pleckstrin homology domain- and DUF828-containing protein. A fusion of the FKD1 promoter and the GUS reporter gene was expressed in vascular tissue throughout the plant, and its expression in incipient veins in leaves narrows in a manner similar to that of PIN1. FKD1 expression in roots and leaves can be altered by changes to auxin response and auxin transport. In the absence of FKD1, PIN1::GFP narrowing to incipient veins is delayed, and localization to the apical cell face is infrequent. The lack of apical PIN1 localization correlates with the failure of newly forming veins to connect distally with previously formed veins. Our data suggest that FKD1 influences PIN1 localization in an auxin-dependent manner, and we propose that it represents a key component of the auxin canalization pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".