A Lightweight Architecture for Secure Two-Party Mobile Payment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evolution of wireless networks and mobile devices has resulted in increased concerns about performance and security of mobile payment systems. In this paper we propose SA2pMP, a lightweight secured architecture for two-party mobile payments. SA2pMP employs a lightweight cryptography scheme that combines public key and symmetric key cryptography systems (ECDSA and AES), as well as a multi-factor authentication mechanism. These are coupled with a transaction log strategy to satisfy the properties of confidentiality, authentication, integrity and non-repudiation. We simulate SA2pMP in a context of money transfer banking transaction, on three different emulators:Sun Java Wireless Toolkit 2.5.2 for CLDC emulator, Sony Ericsson SDK 2.5.0.3 Z800 emulator, and Nokia S60 3rd Edition emulator. We also compare SA2pMP to some existing mobile payment platforms. The result of simulation and comparison proves that SA2pMP is a lightweight secured mechanism that is feasible and suitable for two-party mobile payment transactions, e.g. mobile banking, over Java ME enabled, resource-limited mobile devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it