Altered CTX‐catalyzed and endogenous [<sup>32</sup>P]ADP‐ribosylation of stimulatory G protein α<sub>s</sub> isoforms in postmortem bipolar affective disorder temporal cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reports of elevated Gs alpha subunit (alpha(s)) immunolabeling and cAMP-mediated hyper-functionality in autopsied cerebral cortical brain regions from bipolar affective disorder (BD) patients suggest signal transduction abnormalities occur in this disorder. Because covalent modification of alpha(s) can affect its turnover and levels, we determined whether CTX-catalyzed and endogenous [(32)P] adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosylation of alpha(s) isoforms are altered in temporal and occipital cortical regions, which show elevated alpha(s) levels in BD as compared to nonpsychiatric subjects. Reduced CTX-catalyzed [(32)P]ADP-ribosylated alpha(s-S) and endogenous [(32)P]ADP-ribosylation of a 39-kDa alpha(s)-like protein were found in BD temporal cortex compared to controls. These findings suggest that clearance of these alpha(s) isoforms through ADP-ribosylation may be decreased in BD temporal cortex. Although no differences were observed in mean levels of endogenous and CTX-catalyzed [(32)P]ADP-ribosylation of alpha(s-L) in BD temporal cortex, alpha(s-L) immunolabeling was elevated significantly and correlated inversely with the degree of endogenous [(32)P]ADP-ribosylation of this subunit. In addition, endogenous [(32)P]ADP-ribosylation of an exogenous substrate, myelin basic protein, was similar in BD and comparison subject temporal cortex. Taken together, these observations suggest that elevations of alpha(s) in BD brain are more likely related to factors affecting the disposition or availability of alpha(s) to this posttranslational enzymatic modification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".