MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111557389 · doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00315

Arginine and Vitamin E Modulate the Subpopulations of T Lymphocytes in Broiler Chickens

2007· article· en· W2111557389 on OpenAlexafffund
S. T. Abdukalykova, Xin Zhao, C.A. Ruiz-Feria

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVirology and Viral Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsBroilerBiologyInfectious bursal diseaseVitamin ECD8VaccinationAnimal scienceImmune systemImmunologyAntioxidantBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the effects of vitamin E (VE) and Arg on the subpopulations of T lymphocytes in peripheral blood after an infectious bursal disease virus vaccination (20 d old, n = 54). Broiler chickens were fed diets with normal levels of Arg (NARG, 1.2%) or high levels of Arg (HARG, 2.2%) and 3 levels of VE (40, 80, or 200 IU/kg of feed) in a factorial arrangement of treatments. The percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ cells 9 d after vaccination were not different in birds fed the HARG or NARG feed, but they were higher in birds fed the VE80 diet than in birds fed the VE40 diet. Birds fed the VE200 feed had similar levels of CD4+ and CD8+ cells as birds fed the VE40 diet. However, 19 d after vaccination, the percentage of CD4+ cells was higher in birds fed the HARG (43.93 +/- 1.05) diet than in birds fed the NARG diet (41.14 +/- 1.05) and in birds fed the VE80 and VE200 (44.1 +/- 1.28 and 44.42 +/- 1.28, respectively) diets compared with birds fed the VE40 diet (39.04 +/- 1.28). On the other hand, the percentage of CD8+ cells was highest in birds fed the HARG-VE80 feed compared with all the other Arg and VE combinations. The percentages of CD3+ cells and BU-1+ cells were higher in birds fed the HARG (81.35 +/- 1.46 and 22.3 +/- 0.89, respectively) diet than in birds fed the NARG diets (77.82 +/- 1.46 and 18.93 +/- 0.89, respectively). Birds fed the VE40 had a higher amount of BU-1+ (24.35 +/- 1.073) but lower amounts of CD3+ cells (75.76 +/- 1.76) than birds fed the VE80 (18.46 +/- 1.073 and 81.67 +/- 1.76) and VE200 (19.03 +/- 1.073 and 81.19 +/- 1.76, respectively). Neither Arg nor VE had an effect on the CD4+:CD8+ cell ratio and on the percentage of immature (CD4+CD8+) T lymphocytes 9 d after vaccination. These results suggest that Arg and VE have complimentary effects on cellular and humoral immune function and may enhance the resistance of broilers to infectious diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicVirology and Viral DiseasesFrench-language works237,207