Jointly Estimated Cross-Sectional Mode Choice Models: Specification and Forecast Performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates a number of issues associated with jointly estimating disaggregate logit mode choice models for two periods using data collected at two points in time in independent cross-sectional travel surveys in a given urban area. These include: (1) the effect socio-economic characteristics of travelers have on the predictive and forecast performance of jointly estimated models; and (2) the effect of allowing the variance of the random utilities in the different time periods to differ and, more broadly, the impact transfer-bias scale parameters could have on joint-model predictive performance. The results show that well-specified jointly estimated models using data from two time periods yield comparable disaggregate and aggregate forecasts to those obtained from conventional forecasting models, estimated with data from a single cross-sectional survey. Socio-economic variables and transfer-bias scale parameters are found to enhance model fit to estimation data as well as precision of predictions. The shorter the intervening period between when the two cross-sectional data sets used in joint estimation are collected, the better the jointly estimated models are able to predict the travel choices in each of the survey years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it