MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111602967 · doi:10.1080/17445760500173485

A paradigm for controllable QoS-based medium access control in local and<i>ad hoc</i>wireless networks

2005· article· en· W2111602967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Parallel Emergent and Distributed Systems · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCountdownComputer networkComputer scienceAccess controlNetwork packetQuality of serviceRandom accessChannel access methodProtocol (science)WirelessMultiple Access with Collision Avoidance for WirelessOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolTelecommunicationsRouting protocolEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The carrier sense multiple access/ID countdown (CSMA/IC) is an emerging MAC protocol designed for multi-hop ad hoc wireless networks that differs from CSMA/CA. In this paper, we propose two techniques supporting differentiated service for different priority packets for CSMA/IC, differentiated fair ID countdown (DFIC) and controllable fair ID countdown (CFIC). DFIC supports absolute service differentiation among classes through the use of an explicit priority segment, while CFIC achieves prioritized access through assigning different waiting times for nodes to access the medium. Both of DFIC and CFIC can achieve fairness among nodes of same priority group. CFIC also achieves controllable relative throughout differentiation among different priority levels and can guarantee starvation-free access for all nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it