MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111603423 · doi:10.1243/0954411041560983

A multivariate gait data analysis technique: Application to knee osteoarthritis

2004· article· en· W2111603423 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin J. Deluzio

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaitOsteoarthritisMultivariate statisticsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationGait analysisMultivariate analysisMedicineComputer sciencePhysical therapyMachine learningInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern gait analysis is a powerful non-invasive tool for calculating the mechanical factors involved in pathological processes such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). Although very accurate measurements can be made, the clinical applicability and widespread use of gait analysis have been hindered by a lack of appropriate data analysis techniques for reducing and analysing the resulting large volumes of highly correlated gait data. This paper introduces a multidimensional gait data analysis technique that simultaneously considers multiple time-varying and discrete measures, exploiting the correlation structure between and within the measures. The multidimensional analysis technique was used to detect discriminatory mechanical features of knee OA gait patterns that involved interacting changes in several gait measures, at specific time portions of the gait cycle. The two most discriminatory features described a dynamic alignment difference and a loading response difference with knee OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in MedicineSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207