MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111604339 · doi:10.3934/amc.2013.7.113

Even periodic and odd periodic complementary sequence pairs from generalized Boolean functions

2013· article· en· W2111604339 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mathematics of Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAperiodic graphMathematicsComplementary sequencesBinary Golay codeSequence (biology)Periodic sequencePeriodic functionCombinatoricsFunction (biology)Almost periodic functionDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pair of two sequences is called the even periodic (odd periodic)complementary sequence pair if the sum of their even periodic (oddperiodic) correlation function is a delta function. The well-knownGolay aperiodic complementary sequence pair (Golay pair) is aspecial case of even periodic (odd periodic) complementary sequencepair. In this paper, we presented several classes of even periodicand odd periodic complementary pairs based on the generalizedBoolean functions, but which do not form Gloay pairs. The proposedsequences could be used to design signal sets, which have beenapplied in direct sequence code division multiple (DS-CDMA) cellularcommunication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it