MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Relationships of pre-inoculation high temperature to root browning caused by Pythium aphanidermatum in hydroponically-grown sweet pepper

2009· article· en· W2111634191 on OpenAlexafffund
Coralie R. Sopher, J.C. Sutton

Bibliographic record

VenueTropical Plant Pathology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBrowningPepperPythium aphanidermatumInoculationBiologyHorticultureBotanyBiological pest control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Episodes of high root-zone temperature (33ºC) were investigated in relation to susceptibility of sweet pepper to root rot caused by Pythium aphanidermatum. Pepper plants were grown in aerated nutrient solution in hydroponic units positioned in temperature-controlled water baths. Root zone temperature was 23ºC except during high temperature treatments. Roots were exposed to 33ºC for 0 to 216 h, inoculated with P. aphanidermatum and assesseda at intervals for colonization by the pathogen and for severity of browning (necrosis). The pathogen colonized all roots within 12 h following inoculation. The roots turned brown earlier when exposed to 33ºC for more than 9 h prior to inoculation compared to those exposed for 0 to 6 h. Browning developed progressively earlier as the period at 33ºC was increased from 9 to 144 h, and was 4 days earlier for exposures of 144 to 216 h compared to 0 to 9 h. Browning was precocious also when inoculation was delayed as long as 216 h following exposure at 33ºC for 72 h. We conclude that high temperature predisposes pepper plants to precocious browning caused by P. aphanidermatum and that predisposition lasts for at least 9 days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTropical Plant PathologySame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207