Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertension is the most prevalent of the modifiable risk factors for stroke. The benefits of blood pressure (BP) lowering on primary and secondary prevention of stroke are undeniable. Despite this, BP control in hypertensive individuals and patients with prior cerebrovascular events is suboptimal. Noncompliance, inappropriate antihypertensive usage and under-utilization of medications contribute significantly to inadequate BP control. Recently, elegantly designed studies that assessed the preventive role of BP lowering in patients with cerebrovascular disease have helped clarify management issues in terms of BP targets and effective antihypertensive regimens. Current evidence suggests that BP targets for primary and secondary prevention are suboptimal and need reassessment. The effect of BP modulation in acute stroke is still not completely understood. Although the thresholds for BP treatment in acute stroke have been recommended, BP targets are as yet ill-defined. The available evidence supports early lowering of blood pressure following stroke. This review discusses the impact of blood pressure on stroke incidence and outcomes, outlines the recommendations for blood pressure lowering in stroke and delineates questions that still need to be addressed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".