MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111665870 · doi:10.1109/pac.2001.987839

The TRIUMF facility and cyclotron developments

2002· article· en· W2111665870 on OpenAlexaff
R. Baartman, P. Bricault, M. Dombsky, G. Dutto, K. Fong, T. Y. T. Kuo, Robert Laxdal, A.K. Mitra, R. Ruegg, G. H. Mackenzie, M. Olivo, R. Poirier, K. Reiniger, L. Root, P. W. Schmor, M. Stenning, G. M. Stinson

Bibliographic record

VenuePACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclotronPhysicsProtonBooster (rocketry)Nuclear physicsBeam (structure)Ion sourceLinear particle acceleratorRange (aeronautics)Atomic physicsMaterials sciencePlasmaOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The TRIUMF cyclotron has delivered, over the past several years, simultaneous proton beams to meson users, proton users, and low energy proton users with total intensity around 200 /spl mu/A at energies between 60 and 500 MeV Since 1998 it has also been delivering routinely 500 MeV protons to ISAC with proton currents up to 40 /spl mu/A on target. Initial ISAC experiments were performed with singly charged radioactive ions at target/ion-source energies (E /spl les/ 60 keV). A cw linac consisting of a 35.4 MHz 8 m long RFQ and a 106 MHz DTL accelerator structure has recently been commissioned to energies between 0.153 and 1.53 MeV/u for ions with A<30. A superconducting accelerator to extend the energy range to 6.5 MeV/u (or higher) has been funded. A charge state booster will extend the mass range from A /spl les/ 30 to A /spl les/ 150. In order to increase the primary proton beam current for ISAC to 100 /spl mu/A as planned, and keep up with other user demands, the cyclotron current will be increased to 300 /spl mu/A within one or two years. Preferably this should be achieved without increasing the activation of the cyclotron tank caused by beam stripping losses, mainly at high energy. Challenging requirements are originating from the T1 meson users, demanding a reduction of the beam pulse duration from 4 ns to 2 ns. A 92 MHz 4th harmonic rf booster cavity located in the high energy acceleration region of the cyclotron has been demonstrated to satisfy both above requirements. A cyclotron refurbishing program, was also initiated to keep reliability at the present 90% level or better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207