The TRIUMF facility and cyclotron developments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The TRIUMF cyclotron has delivered, over the past several years, simultaneous proton beams to meson users, proton users, and low energy proton users with total intensity around 200 /spl mu/A at energies between 60 and 500 MeV Since 1998 it has also been delivering routinely 500 MeV protons to ISAC with proton currents up to 40 /spl mu/A on target. Initial ISAC experiments were performed with singly charged radioactive ions at target/ion-source energies (E /spl les/ 60 keV). A cw linac consisting of a 35.4 MHz 8 m long RFQ and a 106 MHz DTL accelerator structure has recently been commissioned to energies between 0.153 and 1.53 MeV/u for ions with A<30. A superconducting accelerator to extend the energy range to 6.5 MeV/u (or higher) has been funded. A charge state booster will extend the mass range from A /spl les/ 30 to A /spl les/ 150. In order to increase the primary proton beam current for ISAC to 100 /spl mu/A as planned, and keep up with other user demands, the cyclotron current will be increased to 300 /spl mu/A within one or two years. Preferably this should be achieved without increasing the activation of the cyclotron tank caused by beam stripping losses, mainly at high energy. Challenging requirements are originating from the T1 meson users, demanding a reduction of the beam pulse duration from 4 ns to 2 ns. A 92 MHz 4th harmonic rf booster cavity located in the high energy acceleration region of the cyclotron has been demonstrated to satisfy both above requirements. A cyclotron refurbishing program, was also initiated to keep reliability at the present 90% level or better.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".