MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111677376 · doi:10.1099/vir.0.81912-0

Analysis of human and swine hepatitis E virus (HEV) isolates of genotype 3 in Japan that are only 81–83 % similar to reported HEV isolates of the same genotype over the entire genome

2006· article· en· W2111677376 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jun Inoue, Masaharu Takahashi, Keiichi Ito, Tooru Shimosegawa, Hiroaki Okamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of General Virology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypeHepatitis E virusBiologyVirologyPhylogenetic treeVirusVeterinary medicineGeneGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Full-length sequences were determined for a human hepatitis E virus (HEV) isolate (HE-JA04-1911) and two swine HEV isolates (swJ8-5 and swJ12-4) that belong to one of three clusters within genotype 3 in Japan and are close to Spanish isolates according to their partial sequences. The three HEV isolates were 89.7-92.9 % identical to each other, but only 80.7-83.0 % similar to 21 HEV strains of the same genotype isolated in Canada, Kyrgyzstan, the USA and Japan over their entire genome. On comparison with HEV isolates whose partial sequence is known, the HE-JA04-1911, swJ8-5 and swJ12-4 isolates segregated into a phylogenetic cluster consisting of human and swine HEV isolates in Japan and the UK, with identities of 89.8-100 % and 87.9-92.4 %, respectively. Genotype 3 HEV isolates were found to be markedly heterogeneous. The UK-isolate-like HEV strains in Japan may have originated from the UK via the importation of pigs since 1900.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of General VirologySame topicHepatitis Viruses Studies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207