MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111691216 · doi:10.1080/1362102022000041222

Introduction: Reconfiguring Canadian Citizenship

2002· article· en· W2111691216 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCitizenship Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipImmigrationScholarshipPolitical scienceCONTESTDemocracyMulticulturalismGood citizenshipState (computer science)Government (linguistics)Gender studiesSociologyLawPoliticsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a ‘Fact Sheet’ on ‘Citizenship’, the Canadian government department charged with immigration and citizenship matters asks the question, ‘What does it mean to be a Canadian citizen?’. In its response, Citizenship and Immigration states that Canada, and thus Canadian citizenship, are deŽ ned in terms of the following characteristics: free and democratic; multicultural; two ofŽ cial languages; and equal treatment to all its citizens. While the contributors to this special issue on ‘reconŽ guring Canadian citizenship’ might agree with the formal accuracy of some aspects of this ofŽ cial discourse on Canada and Canadian citizenship, most would probably wish to contest, qualify, or indeed reject such terms as ‘democratic’ and ‘equal treatment’ when measured against the experience of many groups. Some would also look critically at what is at stake, which interests are represented and which identities and realities are suppressed, in the characterization of Canadian citizenship as ‘multicultural ’ and ‘bilingual’. The robust rediscovery of citizenship as an organizing frame for studies on relations among individuals , rights, states, territories, communities, and markets in Canadian and international scholarship is now as likely to focus on citizenship as inequality and exclusion, rather than citizenship as forms of equal and inclusionary membership. One irony of the dramatic reawakening of scholarly interest in citizenship over the past two decades is that much of its focus has been on the exhaustion and discrediting of nation-state forms of citizenship without a clear sense of the contours and substance of new forms of citizenship, such as post-national , global, cosmopolitan or urban, that might replace the old. The unsettling of nation-state citizenship is inextricably linked to the economic, political, technological , and cultural transformations associated with globalization that have profoundly altered relationships between state, territory and persons. The erosion of nation-state citizenship is also the product of changes that have accompanied corporate globalization , including the weakened capacities of individua l states, the decline in social rights, and the hegemony of neo-liberal governance. In his celebrated analysis, written during the expansion of social programs after the Second World War, T.H. Marshall (1992 [1950]) saw the deŽ ning features of twentieth century citizenship as consisting of the expansion of social citizenship rights, their distribution to previously marginal-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it