A Hidden Markov, Multivariate Autoregressive (HMM-mAR) Network Framework for Analysis of Surface EMG (sEMG) Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the primary noninvasive means to assess muscle activation, the surface electromyogram (sEMG) is of central importance for the study of motor behavior in both clinical and biomedical applications. However, multivariate sEMG analysis is complicated by the fact that data recorded during dynamic contractions are inherently nonstationary. To model this nonstationarity and to determine the dynamic muscle activity patterns during reaching movements, we propose combining hidden Markov models (HMMs) and multivariate autoregressive (mAR) models into a joint HMM-mAR framework. We further propose constructing muscle networks statistically by performing a second level, group analysis on the subject-specific models. Network structural features are subsequently investigated as input features for the purpose of classification. The proposed approach was applied to real sEMG recordings collected from healthy and stroke subjects during reaching movements. When examining group muscle networks, we note that specific muscle connection patterns were selectively recruited during reaching movements and were differentially recruited after stroke compared to healthy subjects. As the analysis was performed on the raw data, the amplitude and the underlying ldquocarrier datardquo of sEMG signals, we notice that the HMM-mAR model fits the amplitude data well, but not the raw or carrier data. The proposed sEMG analysis framework represents a fundamental departure from existing methods where only the amplitude is typically analyzed or the mAR coefficients are directly used for classification. As the method may provide additional insights into motor control, it appears a promising approach warranting further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it