MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111783455 · doi:10.1109/pccc.1993.344510

A technique for combining equalization with generalized differential detection

2002· article· en· W2111783455 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth Mark Aleong, H. Leib, P. Kabal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersymbol interferenceEqualization (audio)Channel (broadcasting)Computer scienceInterference (communication)Blind equalizationDetection theoryDifferential (mechanical device)Tracking (education)Transmission (telecommunications)AlgorithmElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsDetectorPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A generalized differential coherent detection technique combined with equalization for data transmission over intersymbol interference (ISI) channels is considered when carrier phase tracking is difficult. In the absence of ISI, the SNR performance of this generalized differential coherent structure is very close to the coherent detection bound. The authors present the integration of this generalized differential detection method with channel equalization, and therefore extend the applications of this detection technique to channels with ISI. It is shown that for high SNR, the performance degradation of this structure with respect to coherent detection and equalization is negligible. Analysis and computer simulation results show that this combined detection/equalization technique is an effective solution to the ISI problem when carrier phase tracking is difficult.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207