MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111801495 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2007.4413688

H<inf>∞</inf> control design for uncertain linear systems with time-varying delays using LMI

2007· article· en· W2111801495 on OpenAlexaff
Farzaneh Abdollahi, K. Khorasani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Linear matrix inequalityController (irrigation)Robust controlUpper and lower boundsConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceFull state feedbackStability (learning theory)Function (biology)MathematicsControl (management)Control systemMathematical optimizationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new delay-dependent approach for robust control of multiple time-varying delayed systems with uncertain parameters is proposed. The internal stability of the proposed controller is shown by proposing a new Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional. The upper bound of the delay and its time-derivative are explicitly used in designing the controller. No constraint is imposed on the time-delay functions. Hence, the closed-loop system performance is more robust and less conservative in terms of tolerating the effects of time-varying delays. Moreover, the proposed controller does not rely on restrictive assumptions on the rate of change of time-delay function, (i.e. \tau\ < 1), which makes it applicable to fast time varying delayed systems. Finally, a robust state feedback controller is designed via Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) technique. Unlike many previous methods, no parameter tuning is necessary to solve the resulting LMI conditions. Simulation results confirm that our proposed controller yields results that are more robust and less conservative as compared to existing methods in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207