Effet de la lumière et de la température sur le rythme d'activité de la marmotte alpine (<i>Marmota marmota</i> Linné, 1758) en milieu naturel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
External daily activity was studied in the alpine marmot (Marmota marmota Linné, 1758) in its natural environment in relation to the position of the sun, ambient temperature, and food accessibility. At low temperatures, daily activity starts only when the sun reaches 30° or more above the horizon. During temperate periods, external daily activity is closely synchronized with the height of the sun (16°-17° above the horizon). However, on hot days the duration of surface activity of alpine marmots at the end of the day could be explained by the postponement of feeding when high and uncomfortable midday temperatures limit food accessibility. Our observations under natural conditions seem to indicate that several factors are involved in the synchronization of nyctemeral activity in the alpine marmot. The cycle of light, expressed as the height of the sun above the horizon, is the most important. However, marmots show different responses to light in the morning and at night. These results corroborate the circadian rhythm model with two oscillators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".