ThriftStore: Finessing Reliability Trade-Offs in Replicated Storage Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores the feasibility of a storage architecture that offers the reliability and access performance characteristics of a high-end system, yet is cost-efficient. We propose ThriftStore, a storage architecture that integrates two types of components: volatile, aggregated storage and dedicated, yet low-bandwidth durable storage. On the one hand, the durable storage forms a back end that enables the system to restore the data the volatile nodes may lose. On the other hand, the volatile nodes provide a high-throughput front-end. Although integrating these components has the potential to offer a unique combination of high throughput and durability at a low cost, a number of concerns need to be addressed to architect and correctly provision the system. To this end, we develop analytical and simulation-based tools to evaluate the impact of system characteristics (e.g., bandwidth limitations on the durable and the volatile nodes) and design choices (e.g., the replica placement scheme) on data availability and the associated system costs (e.g., maintenance traffic). Moreover, to demonstrate the high-throughput properties of the proposed architecture, we prototype a GridFTP server based on ThriftStore. Our evaluation demonstrates an impressive, up to 800 Mbps transfer throughput for the new GridFTP service.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it