Design and evaluation of a real-time fuel-optimal control system for series hybrid electric vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a real–time optimal controller that will reduce fuel consumption in a series hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). This real–time drive cycle–independent controller is designed using a control–oriented model and Pontryagin's minimum principle for an off–line optimisation problem, and is shown to be optimal in real–time applications. Like other proposed controllers in the literature, this controller still requires some information about future driving conditions, but the amount of information is reduced. Although the controller design procedure explained here is based on a series HEV with NiMH battery as the electric energy storage, the same procedure can be used to find the supervisory controller for a series HEV with an ultra–capacitor. To evaluate the performance of the model–based controller, it is coupled to a high–fidelity series HEV model that includes physics–based component models and low–level controllers. The simulation results show that the simplified control–oriented model is accurate enough in predicting real vehicle behaviour, and final fuel consumption can be reduced using the model–based controller. Such a reduction in HEVs fuel consumption will significantly contribute to nationwide fuel saving.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".