MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111833717 · doi:10.1063/1.3266967

Antiproton, positron, and electron imaging with a microchannel plate/phosphor detector

2009· article· en· W2111833717 on OpenAlexaff
Gorm Bruun Andresen, W. Bertsche, P. D. Bowe, C. C. Bray, E. Butler, C. L. Cesar, S. C. Chapman, M. Charlton, S. Seif El Nasr, J. Fajans, M. Fujiwara, D. R. Gill, J. S. Hangst, W. N. Hardy, R. Hayano, M. E. Hayden, A. J. Humphries, R. Hydomako, L. V. Jørgensen, Sean Kerrigan, L. L. Kurchaninov, R. Lambo, N. Madsen, P. Nolan, K. Olchanski, Å. Olin, A. Povilus, P. Pusa, E. Sarid, D. M. Silveira, James Storey, R. I. Thompson, D. P. van der Werf, Y. Yamazaki, ALPHA Collaboration

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgarySimon Fraser UniversityTRIUMFUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsMicrochannel plate detectorPhosphorDetectorElectronNuclear physicsAntiprotonPhysicsPositronOpticsMaterials scienceProton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A microchannel plate (MCP)/phosphor screen assembly has been used to destructively measure the radial profile of cold, confined antiprotons, electrons, and positrons in the ALPHA experiment, with the goal of using these trapped particles for antihydrogen creation and confinement. The response of the MCP to low energy (10-200 eV, <1 eV spread) antiproton extractions is compared to that of electrons and positrons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207