Regional-scale groundwater flow in a Canadian Shield setting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A three-dimensional numerical analysis of a 5734 km2 watershed situated in the Canadian Shield has been conducted to illustrate aspects of regional-scale groundwater flow in a crystalline rock setting. An essential requirement of the analysis is the preservation and accurate description of the complex topography, surface water drainage network, groundwater salinity distribution, and permeability distributions. The postglacial evolution of the groundwater flow system was investigated using the finite difference model SWIFT-III. Robustness was assessed by exploring the sensitivity of groundwater flow to topography, variable matrix permeability distribution models, pore-water salinity, and the dissipation of elevated initial pore pressures that result from ice that overlaid the watershed in the last glacial period. Groundwater flow analyses indicate that freshwater heads in all model layers are highly correlated with the complex surface topography such that the transition from zones of groundwater recharge to zones of discharge occurs over distances that can be relatively short. Shallow flow to a depth of tens of metres dominates the overall water balance, and the length of flow paths is relatively short. The analyses of this study indicate that the flow in deeper rock is not regional but rather is a subdued reflection of the local-scale surface topography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".