MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111893258 · doi:10.1109/icma.2005.1626576

Causal inversion of a single-link flexible-link manipulator via output planning

2006· article· en· W2111893258 on OpenAlexaff
M. Vakil, Reza Fotouhi, P.N. Nikiforuk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Link (geometry)Extension (predicate logic)Inversion (geology)PolynomialComputer scienceTrajectoryInverseRobot end effectorMathematicsRobotArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, a method was introduced by Bensoman and Le Vey (July 2003) for the stable inversion of a single-input single-output (SISO) non-minimum phase system through the employment of output planning. The use of a causal input via output planning permits the initial conditions to be freely selected. In the application of this method to a single-link flexible-link manipulator (SFLM), for any initial conditions a polynomial is sought for the end-effector's trajectory that cancels the effects of the internal instability of the inverse system. A drawback of this method, however, is that allows for the development of only one polynomial for any initial conditions imposed on the input and output. An extension of this method is proposed in this paper which does not suffer from this drawback. This extension employs exponential functions to define the end-effector's trajectory, which leads not to just one solution, but to a family of solutions. The results of some simulation studies that verify the proposed extension are included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207