MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111903334

CRETACEOUS TROPICAL RAINFORESTS FROM NORTHERN MEXICO AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH SOUTH-CENTRAL NORTH AMERICAN FLORAS

2013· article· en· W2111903334 on OpenAlexaff
Emilio Estrada‐Ruiz, Hugo I. Martínez‐Cabrera, Judith Callejas-Moreno

Bibliographic record

VenuePolibotánica · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyGeologyPhysical geographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ESUMEN Estudios previos sugieren que las selvas tropicales y paratropicales dominadas por angiospermas tuvieron una distribucion importante en America del Norte durante el Cenozoico temprano (Paleoceno-Eoceno). Investigaciones recientes indican que fl oras bajo condiciones megatermales podrian ha-ber estado presentes en el norte de Mexico y centro-sur de Estados Unidos de America desde el Cretacico Superior (ca. 73 Ma). En Coahuila, en los sedimentos de las forma-ciones Cerro del Pueblo y Olmos, se han documentado diversas floras que, por su contenido fosilifero y su ubicacion paleo-geografi ca, sugieren la presencia de selvas tropicales y paratropicales. Aqui hacemos un breve recuento de la composicion fl oristica, caracteristicas fi sonomicas de las plantas, asi como de las interpretaciones paleoclimaticas o paleoambientales de las paleofl oras del norte de Mexico y centro-sur de EU. Tambien analizamos la similitud fl oristica de estas formaciones basados en morfogeneros de la madera. Nuestros resultados muestran que la similitud fl oristica entre formaciones tiene cierta congruencia geografi ca. Sin embargo, existen elementos con amplia distribucion y otras plantas endemicas en localidades parti-culares, lo cual sugiere cierta diferenciacion en su composicion. La validez de este patron es, sin embargo, preliminar debido a la au-sencia de un entendimiento profundo de la composicion fl oristica de estas comunidades hasta el momento.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolibotánicaSame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207