Protéger les jeunes et développer le pouvoir d’agir de leurs parents. Une analyse des pratiques d’implication parentale en centre jeunesse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article rapporte les résultats d’une étude évaluative portant sur les pratiques d’implication parentale des intervenants sociaux du Centre jeunesse de Québec. La présente évaluation met l’accent sur les composantes et sur les processus relevant des pratiques qui contribuent à l’implication des parents dont un jeune reçoit des services en vertu de la Loi sur la protection de la jeunesse. Cet article porte, d’une part, sur les représentations qu’ont les intervenants de l’implication parentale et, d’autre part, sur les rôles qu’ils jouent en vue de favoriser cette implication. Ces résultats sont examinés à la lumière de la théorie sur l’ empowerment des individus, qui constitue le cadre conceptuel de cette étude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".