Prospects for Adaptable Technological Innovations in Fresh Fish Processing and Storage in Rural Areas of Doma L.G.A. of Nasarawa State
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most fish become inedible within 12 hours at tropical temperatures after capture. Spoilage begins as soon as the fish dies and processing should therefore be done quickly to prevent the growth of spoilage bacteria. Fishing activities are of very importance to the agricultural sector. This paper is aimed at dealing with the problems and prospects of fresh fish processing and storage. The study was carried out by means of structured questionnaires administered to selected fishermen and traders in 2003-2006. The performance of fresh fish market’s revealed that 82% of the fish marketers are middlemen. Over 96% of the respondents process the fish into smoked fish. The smoked fish generally reduce the profit of the fish marketers according to 90% of the respondents. 85% of the respondents complained of suffering as a result of crude method of processing and 73% of the processors of fresh fish by smoking are women. It is recommended that natural fresh storage projects should be provided and commissioned by the Federal Government while storage centres could be created at Doma and some selected fishing villages by the Government.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".