MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2111977429 · doi:10.1086/374051

Contamination of Bone Marrow Products with an Actinomycete Resembling<i>Microbacterium</i>Species and Reinfusion into Autologous Stem Cell and Bone Marrow Transplant Recipients

2003· article· en· W2111977429 on OpenAlexaff
Zahir Hirji, R Saragosa, Heln Dedier, Michael Crump, Norman Franke, Lori L. Burrows, Frances Jamieson, Shirley Brown, Michael Gardam

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMinistry of Health and Long Term CareHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContaminationBone marrowOutbreakBlood productMicrobacteriumStem cellCryopreservationMicrobiologyImmunologySurgeryBiologyPathologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacterial contamination of bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant products typically occurs with skin flora or, rarely, gram-negative organisms. We describe a clonal outbreak of contamination in transplant products caused by contamination with an aerobic actinomycete that occurred at our institution during the summer of 2001. From 1 July through 12 September 2001, 73 peripheral blood or bone marrow stem cell products were obtained from 39 patients, and 34 products were found to be contaminated with the outbreak strain. Fourteen patients were reinfused with contaminated cells, and the outbreak strain was isolated from the blood cultures for one patient. Investigation revealed multiple potential sources for contamination during the product cryopreservation process. The outbreak of contamination was aborted upon modification of the cryopreservation process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious Diseases→Same topicMycobacterium research and diagnosis→French-language works237,207→