MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112012086 · doi:10.1115/1.1413472

Numerical Investigation of Tandem-Impeller Designs for a Gas Turbine Compressor

2001· article· en· W2112012086 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Turbomachinery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPratt and Whitney Canada
KeywordsImpellerSlip factorTandemGas compressorTurbineCentrifugal compressorMechanical engineeringAerodynamicsMechanicsMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tandem-bladed impeller centrifugal compressor, which may offer potential aerodynamic benefits over conventional designs, is rarely employed in production gas turbine applications. Conventional impeller designs are often favored because of concerns for both significant performance losses and increased manufacturing costs associated with tandem configurations. In addition, much of the available literature concerning the characteristics of tandem-impellers is inconclusive, and at times contradictory. Because of the scarcity of tandem-impellers, rules for their design are nearly nonexistent. Also, the effects of inducer/exducer clocking upon tandem-impeller performance and exit flow characteristics are not fully understood. In the present study, a numerical investigation was performed to investigate the aerodynamic characteristics of a tandem-impeller design for the rear stage of a gas turbine compressor (target impeller PRt−t≈3.0). A parametric study of tandem-impeller inducer/exducer clocking was performed in order to explore its effect upon performance and exit flow quality. Because the tandem impeller was designed to be retrofittable for an existing conventional impeller, it was also compared to predictions for the baseline conventional design. Results of the study indicated that the tandem-impeller was less efficient than the conventional design for all clocking configurations studied. Tandem-impeller blade clocking was found to have a significant effect upon predicted pressure ratio, temperature ratio, efficiency, and slip factor; the maximum values for these parameters were predicted for the in-line tandem configuration. The minimum predicted tandem-impeller isentropic efficiency occurred at a clocking fraction of 50 percent, falling 3.8 points below that of the in-line case. Although the tandem-impeller performance was predicted to diminish as blade clocking was increased, significant improvements in the uniformity of impeller exit velocity profiles were observed. Profiles of both total pressure and swirl at impeller exit indicated that the tandem-impeller design may offer both improved diffuser recovery and stalling margin over the conventional design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it