Bibliographic record
Abstract
This 150-page softcover book is a very easy-to-read synopsis of a rather difficult subject. Although it certainly does simplify the subject, “made ridiculously easy” may be a bit of an understatement. This book provides a straightforward and systematic approach to acid-base and electrotype problems. It is intended for the current practitioner, resident, and anyone involved in intravenous fluid therapy. The text involves an essential discussion of the key pathophysiology involved in each disorder and the important elements involved in the diagnosis and treatment of each disorder. It avoids excessive discussion of scientific detail, instead focusing on the overall approach to handling each case. The book is divided into 10 chapters followed by an index. These chapters discuss abnormalities of the electrolytes sodium and potassium, metabolic and respiratory acidosis and alkalosis, and finally mixed acid-base disorders. The final chapter involves case examples. Indeed, more than half of this excellent book involves clinical examples. Each clinical example involves a case presentation followed by a detailed approach to diagnosis and treatment. These augment the initial chapter, which discusses the basics, with particular emphasis on renal physiology, and the chapter on “IV Solutions and IV Orders.” Each case entails the diagnosis of the acid-base disorder involving essentially 3 steps, the approach to the individual electrolytes, and finally management considerations. The amount of repetition from case to case, as well as in the discussion of each case, is just right in highlighting the important points. Each chapter also highlights the important formulae involved in both diagnosis and treatment. Many tables (called “figures”) very nicely summarize the discussions found in the text and help in the differential diagnosis of each disorder. Many of these formulae are summarized on the inside cover of this book, under the heading “Normal Values.” This book neatly accomplishes its goal with its systematic approach to a very complicated (before reading this book) subject. Its step-by-step methods are based on firm scientific principles, and thus they are quite easy to understand and to remember. This is an excellent addition to the library of any practitioner treating patients both in the hospital and on an outpatient basis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.075 | 0.067 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".