MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2112048672 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2015-0166

The potential anti-proliferative effect of β-sitosterol on human mast cell line-1 cells

2015· article· en· W2112048672 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Na‐Ra Han, Hyung‐Min Kim, Hyun‐Ja Jeong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsThymic stromal lymphopoietinMast cellCell growthCell cultureDownregulation and upregulationChemistryCell biologyMolecular biologyImmunologyCytokineCancer researchBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) was reported to induce mast cell proliferation and aggravate allergic reactions through activation of mouse double minute 2 (MDM2). We aimed to ascertain that β-sitosterol (SI), which is one of the several phytosterols found mostly in foods, would regulate TSLP-induced mast cell proliferation. The results showed that SI significantly decreased the proliferation of human mast cell line (HMC-1) cells promoted by TSLP. SI significantly decreased the mRNA expression of Ki-67 in the TSLP-treated HMC-1 cells. SI significantly suppressed the production and mRNA expression of interleukin-13 in the TSLP-treated HMC-1 cells. Furthermore, SI downregulated the expression of MDM2 and phosphorylation of STAT6, whereas it upregulated the expression of p53, activation of caspase-3, and cleavage of poly ADP-ribose polymerase in the TSLP-treated HMC-1 cells. Results of this study suggest that SI may be a potential therapeutic agent for mast cell-mediated allergic diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→