MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2112059214 · doi:10.1109/cnsr.2011.50

Intelligent Power Management for QoS-Aware Multimedia in Cognitive Mesh Networks Using Reinforcement Learning

2011· article· en· W2112059214 on OpenAlexaff
Ayoub Alsarhan, Anjali Agarwal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceComputer networkHeuristicsReinforcement learningChannel (broadcasting)Cognitive radioExploitSpectrum managementPower controlScheme (mathematics)Distributed computingPower (physics)WirelessComputer securityTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cognitive multimedia mesh networks (CMMNs), unlicensed users (secondary users, SUs) can share the spectrum with licensed users (primary users, PUs) on a non-interfering basis. The main challenge in CMMN is how to implement an efficient optimal control policy that can allocate spectrum and transmission powers for the SUs efficiently and how to adapt these resources to the changing network conditions. The power management scheme should control the SUs powers in such a way that their data communication rate is not affected. SUs power cannot be dropped indefinitely but it should be bounded such that the quality of service (QoS) for the SUs is still supported. Our objective is to serve the maximum number of users and support their QoS while protecting the PUs' rights of using the spectrum exclusively. Due to the direct relationship between the data rate and the quality of the communication channel, we propose a new spectrum allocation scheme that exploits the physical properties of the channel to achieve better performance. In addition to consider QoS for users, our scheme uses several heuristics for selecting channels that meet users requirements. These heuristics include channel error rates, PUs activities, channel capacity and channel adaptation time. Performance evaluation of the proposed scheme shows that the scheme is able to support additional SUs traffic while still ensuring PUs QoS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207