Investigating the Gaussian Convergence of the Distribution of the Aggregate Interference Power in Large Wireless Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distribution of the aggregate interference power in large wireless networks has gained increasing attention with the emergence of different types of wireless networks such as ad hoc networks, sensor networks, and cognitive radio networks. The interference in such networks is often characterized using the Poisson point process (PPP). As the number of interfering nodes increases, there might be a tendency to approximate the distribution of the aggregate interference power by a Gaussian random variable, given that the individual interference signals are independent. However, some observations in the literature suggest that this Gaussian approximation is not valid, except under some specific scenarios. In this paper, we cast these observations in a single mathematical framework and express the conditions for which the Gaussian approximation will be valid for the aggregate interference power generated by a Poisson field of interferers. Furthermore, we discuss the effect of different system and channel parameters on the convergence of the distribution of the aggregate interference to a Gaussian distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it