Sexual differences in response to larval food stress in two nuptial feeding orthopterans – implications for sexual selection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extent to which a trait deteriorates in response to stress can indicate its fitness importance. Food limitation is a naturally‐occurring stress in the katydid Kawanaphila nartee (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) and should cue larvae as to the level of sexual competition expected; hunger drives adult females to compete for copulations and thus acquire spermatophore meals. This increases sexual selection on females relative to males for increased body mass. As predicted, under experimental food‐stress larval female K. nartee showed little loss of mass whereas male mass decreased. In contrast, the sizes of body parts less critical to mating success showed similar decreases in males and females. For katydids such as Conocephalus nigropleurum , where reversals in mating roles do not occur, larval food stress should result in a greater preservation of male body mass, an important trait in male mating success. This prediction was supported; male mass decreased less than that of females.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".